• archive
  • blog
  • publications
  • store
  • about
  • contact
  • newsletter
  • Menu

aows

  • archive
  • blog
  • publications
  • store
  • about
  • contact
  • newsletter

Taking a long exposure of the Full Moon with film

October 10, 2017

I don't usually chase "that one shot". I like to go somewhere, drive around, walk, hike... and take the shots I see as I go. It's usually a very rough plan and pretty flexible. I don't wait hours for a photo either.

But I'd had one specific image in mind for a while, and I decided to go for it this last week: a long exposure of the full moon moving through the sky.

It was the first time I was taking a long exposure at night using film, and my first time ever taking a long exposure of the moon. Metering for something like this wasn't easy.

Choosing the place wasn't straightforward either. I had three possible locations with interesting foregrounds, each of them meant a 2-hour drive plus the way back home, and of course all of them at night. I finally went with Mt St Helens since the exposure would be from 7-8pm to 10-11pm, instead of crazy hours in the middle of the night. It was arguably the most beautiful of the three as well.

I used my digital camera as a light meter. I started the exposure at 7:15pm, during blue hour. I knew the settings the camera was telling me would change as it got darker, but I was hoping the full moon would light up the landscape. Using my 50mm wide lens, I set it to f/4. That'd be a regular 1-second exposure, but I needed 3 hours to get the whole path of the moon across the sky.

To achieve that, I used a 10-stop ND filter. The exposure changed from 1 second to 16 minutes, and adding the reciprocity failure of the film, that meant 2 hours and 45 minutes - very close to the 3 hours I wanted. I had the settings I was looking for!

And I think they were, for the most part, the right values. I made a terrible mistake though: I was using Kodak Tri-X instead of what I thought I was using, Ilford HP5+. First time this happened to me, precisely the time I was taking a shot like this one! Kodak Tri-X requires a longer exposure, the previous math changed from a 2h45min exposure to an almost 4-hour exposure. So yeah, that was bad news.

Normally, I'd try to compensate for that during development, but I had other images on that roll that were properly exposed and I didn't want to lose. So I developed it at regular times. The foreground, the mountain, was as I expected underexposed (see first photo below).

View fullsize img001.jpg
View fullsize img002.jpg

I didn't want to play digital tricks, but I used another shot I took right after I finished the long exposure (see second photo above) and blended them together on Photoshop. A bit of cheating I guess, but I'm pleased with the result.

Prev / Next
Featured
May 5, 2025
The first days are the hardest
May 5, 2025
May 5, 2025
Apr 22, 2025
Goodbye, SF
Apr 22, 2025
Apr 22, 2025
Apr 15, 2025
How wide is *too* wide?
Apr 15, 2025
Apr 15, 2025
Mar 28, 2025
Roads of Scotland
Mar 28, 2025
Mar 28, 2025
Mar 27, 2025
Obsessed
Mar 27, 2025
Mar 27, 2025
Mar 26, 2025
6 unexpected ways more megapixels help my photography
Mar 26, 2025
Mar 26, 2025
Mar 25, 2025
On Fuji cameras, dials, and the lost art of consistency
Mar 25, 2025
Mar 25, 2025