• archive
  • blog
  • publications
  • store
  • about
  • contact
  • newsletter
  • Menu

aows

  • archive
  • blog
  • publications
  • store
  • about
  • contact
  • newsletter

Art made by and for humans

March 02, 2019 in journal

In this day and age where AI is starting to take over photography (see: portraits of people that don't exist made by AI, one is tempted to think that photography is doomed.

I believe this might open new opportunities for (human) artists, actually.

Computers can be trained to recognize good art: show them drawings, sculptures, paintings, writings, photographs... from the last few thousand years, and they might come up with something amazing by any traditional standard.

There's one thing that differentiates humans and computers, though. Computers start wide and they go narrow, getting better and better at the specific task they have been commended to do. On the contrary, humans have the ability to suddenly go off the script and create something that no one -or very few- have done before.

We have examples all over history, new and radically different ideas can appear at any moment and spread like fire. There are moments in history that can only be described as huge leaps in human progress, usually attained by breaking with all the norms from the past.

For example, think of what the Beatles did to rock and pop music.

This is something a computer can't do: they always move towards a goal that can be measured, they have to know if they are moving in the right direction. With generated photographs, they create something similar to what they've seen through training, the more similar the better.

Even if they were allowed some departure or even randomness on their "creative thought", what would happen if no one likes their art?. Consider Van Gogh, he was seen as a failure when he was alive and his work only gained popularity years after his death. Would we allow a computer to keep making something we see as a failure, or would we shut it off?

I think that while capturing the world as it is is a relatively easy task for a computer, creating meaningful new art is something still reserved for humans. For now.

Tags: art, ai, computational photography, photography, computers, humankind
Prev / Next
Featured
May 5, 2025
The first days are the hardest
May 5, 2025
May 5, 2025
Apr 22, 2025
Goodbye, SF
Apr 22, 2025
Apr 22, 2025
Apr 15, 2025
How wide is *too* wide?
Apr 15, 2025
Apr 15, 2025
Mar 28, 2025
Roads of Scotland
Mar 28, 2025
Mar 28, 2025
Mar 27, 2025
Obsessed
Mar 27, 2025
Mar 27, 2025
Mar 26, 2025
6 unexpected ways more megapixels help my photography
Mar 26, 2025
Mar 26, 2025
Mar 25, 2025
On Fuji cameras, dials, and the lost art of consistency
Mar 25, 2025
Mar 25, 2025