• archive
  • blog
  • publications
  • store
  • about
  • contact
  • newsletter
  • Menu

aows

  • archive
  • blog
  • publications
  • store
  • about
  • contact
  • newsletter
cover_mf_vs_apsc.jpg

Medium Format Film vs APS-C Digital

August 31, 2018 in journal

Yesterday, just for fun, I ran a little experiment and shot the same compositions with both the Bronica and the Sony a6500. Then, I tried to create the same images from the negatives and RAW files and compared them.

The results? (Un)surprising!

 
 

Cathedral, Lugo, through the viewfinder.

 

Disclaimer

This is not a comparison between medium format film and a digital APS-C sensor. The sheer difference in sensor size has a lot of implications, like depth of field.

I also used the darkroom equipment I have available, including a relatively cheap Epson v550 scanner. There are better options out there to get better quality out of the negatives.

Lastly, these are two completely different system and each one has its own applications.

In this post, I compare them from my point of view and my usage of both cameras to create small, square, and black and white images.

 
 

Aquila, Roman Eagle, through the viewfinder

 

Show me the images

Here we go. You can see which one is film and which one digital at the end of the post. Try to guess it first, though!

View fullsize 1a
1a
View fullsize 1b
1b
View fullsize 2a
2a
View fullsize 2b
2b
View fullsize 3a
3a
View fullsize 3b
3b
View fullsize 4a
4a
View fullsize 4b
4b
View fullsize 5a
5a
View fullsize 5b
5b
View fullsize 6a
6a
View fullsize 6b
6b
View fullsize 7a
7a
View fullsize 7b
7b
View fullsize 8a
8a
View fullsize 8b
8b
 

Differences

Medium format film shows an overall better contrast. I like how HP5 rendered the highlights. It did take some work to "fix" the brighter parts in the digital files.

When zooming in really close, digital is able to show more details, but it starts to look worse and worse. Film might not be able to show the details of that sign that is 1,000 feet away, but I'm sure it'd look better when printed big. It's smoother, more natural, a better texture.

Overall, I was relatively surprised to see how good of a job the Sony a6500 did when compared to a huge film format like 6x6.

The difference in the micro-contrast is not big, and after playing with the files for a bit in Lightroom, I was able to achieve a film-like look. I'd say pretty damn close to the negatives from the Bronica.

 

The Bronica is still my favorite camera to shoot with.

Conclusion

I'm happy with the outcome of this experiment. Both cameras are perfectly capable to produce outstanding images for the kind of work I do.

The experience of shooting the Bronica is very different from shooting the Sony, though. That's the reason why I shoot film, anyway.

 

solutions

1a - digital, 1b - film
2a - digital, 2b - film
3a - digital, 3b - film
4a - film, 4b - digital
5a - digital, 5b - film
6a - film, 6b - digital
7a - film, 1b - digital
8a - digital, 8b - film

Tags: film photography, digital, bronica, sony a6500, black and white, photography, camera gear
Prev / Next
Featured
Jun 12, 2025
A local photography adventure
Jun 12, 2025
Jun 12, 2025
Jun 7, 2025
Live with FRAMES magazine
Jun 7, 2025
Jun 7, 2025
Jun 5, 2025
Conversation with Dimitris Kotakos
Jun 5, 2025
Jun 5, 2025
Jun 5, 2025
Creative B&W Editing in Elements Magazine
Jun 5, 2025
Jun 5, 2025
Jun 5, 2025
Some images are gone forever... and new ones appeared
Jun 5, 2025
Jun 5, 2025
May 29, 2025
This trip demanded everything
May 29, 2025
May 29, 2025
May 19, 2025
Photography Plans vs Reality (from the Upper Peninsula, Michigan)
May 19, 2025
May 19, 2025